[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrUJeOPvujnx--ZLQXJAaj0x8YEjftdt-rR=UiVijCrvcg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 14:49:27 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
He Zhe <zhe.he@...driver.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, devel@...ukata.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] x86/paravirt: Make read_cr2() CALLEE_SAVE
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 1:03 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> The one paravirt read_cr2() implementation (Xen) is actually quite
> trivial and doesn't need to clobber anything other than the return
> register. By making read_cr2() CALLEE_SAVE we avoid all the PUSH/POP
> nonsense and allow more convenient use from assembly.
Wow, this is incomprehensible! :) I'll trust Juergen's review.
--Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists