[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <38f864df-9c90-31a3-d78d-7aaf2d726e4f@web.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 21:15:31 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] nvme: One function call less in nvme_update_disk_info()
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 21:08:12 +0200
Avoid an extra function call by using a ternary operator instead of
a conditional statement.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index b2dd4e391f5c..73888195bdb2 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -1650,10 +1650,7 @@ static void nvme_update_disk_info(struct gendisk *disk,
nvme_config_discard(disk, ns);
nvme_config_write_zeroes(disk, ns);
- if (id->nsattr & (1 << 0))
- set_disk_ro(disk, true);
- else
- set_disk_ro(disk, false);
+ set_disk_ro(disk, id->nsattr & (1 << 0) ? true : false);
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(disk->queue);
}
--
2.22.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists