linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nvme: One function call less in nvme_update_disk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b701a461-4c89-3860-bc99-0662db2382c2@kernel.dk>
Date:   Fri, 5 Jul 2019 13:35:19 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: One function call less in nvme_update_disk_info()

On 7/5/19 1:15 PM, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2019 21:08:12 +0200
> 
> Avoid an extra function call by using a ternary operator instead of
> a conditional statement.
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>   drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 5 +----
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index b2dd4e391f5c..73888195bdb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -1650,10 +1650,7 @@ static void nvme_update_disk_info(struct gendisk *disk,
>   	nvme_config_discard(disk, ns);
>   	nvme_config_write_zeroes(disk, ns);
> 
> -	if (id->nsattr & (1 << 0))
> -		set_disk_ro(disk, true);
> -	else
> -		set_disk_ro(disk, false);
> +	set_disk_ro(disk, id->nsattr & (1 << 0) ? true : false);

Let's please not, the original is much more readable.

-- 
Jens Axboe