linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] S.A.R.A. a new stacked LSM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <HJktY5gtjje4zNNpxEQx_tBd_TRDsjz0-7kL29cMNXFvB_t6KSgOHHXFQef04GQFqCi1Ie3oZFh9DS9_m-70pJtnunZ2XS0UlGxXwK9UcYo=@protonmail.ch>
Date:   Sat, 06 Jul 2019 14:33:04 +0000
From:   Jordan Glover <Golden_Miller83@...tonmail.ch>
To:     Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@...il.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
        <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
        Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] S.A.R.A. a new stacked LSM

On Saturday, July 6, 2019 10:54 AM, Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@...il.com> wrote:

> S.A.R.A. is meant to be stacked but it needs cred blobs and the procattr
> interface, so I temporarily implemented those parts in a way that won't
> be acceptable for upstream, but it works for now. I know that there
> is some ongoing work to make cred blobs and procattr stackable, as soon
> as the new interfaces will be available I'll reimplement the involved
> parts.

I thought all stacking pieces for minor LSM were merged in Linux 5.1.
Is there still something missing or is this comment out-fo-date?

Jordan