lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190706143307.GA2240@kroah.com>
Date:   Sat, 6 Jul 2019 16:33:07 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 4

On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 08:17:29PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 11:46:47 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 07:44:12PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 10:34:33 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:  
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 10:24:50PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:  
> > > > > 
> > > > > This release produces a whole lot (over 200) of this message in my qemu
> > > > > boot tests:
> > > > > 
> > > > > [    1.698497] debugfs: File 'sched' already present!
> > > > > 
> > > > > Introduced by commit
> > > > > 
> > > > >   43e23b6c0b01 ("debugfs: log errors when something goes wrong")
> > > > > 
> > > > > from the driver-core tree.  I assume that the error(?) was already
> > > > > happening, but it is now being reported.    
> > > > 
> > > > What are you passing to qemu to get this?  I just tried it myself and
> > > > see no error reports at all.  Have a .config I can use to try to
> > > > reproduce this?  
> > > 
> > > It is a powerpc pseries_le_defconfig kernel and I run qemu like this:
> > > 
> > > qemu-system-ppc64 -M pseries -m 2G -vga none -nographic -kernel vmlinux -initrd rootfs.cpio.gz  
> > 
> > Hm, I think my rootfs initrd might be quite simple compared to yours (it
> > drops me into a busybox shell).  Any pointers to where you created yours
> > from?
> 
> Michael Ellerman gave it to me.  It is very simple.  Its /init is just
> 
> $ cat init
> #!/bin/sh
> # devtmpfs does not get automounted for initramfs
> /bin/mount -t devtmpfs devtmpfs /dev
> exec 0</dev/console
> exec 1>/dev/console
> exec 2>/dev/console
> exec /sbin/init $*
> 
> and /sbin/init is a link to /bin/busybox
> 
> It is all run by an expect script that just waits for the login:
> prompt, logs in a root and runs "halt".
> 
> All the debugfs messages appear before the kernel finished booting.

Thanks, this helped.  Looks like it is the loop device causing this.  Or
at least I can trigger it here with that module.

And it seems that the debugfs code for those devices never worked, let
me unwind the mess of pointers to try to find the real solution here...

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ