[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4b9ae7b8-310c-e0b6-7a8e-33e6d5bef83d@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 20:47:38 +0200
From: Dag Moxnes <dag.moxnes@...cle.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: dledford@...hat.com, leon@...nel.org, parav@...lanox.com,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] RDMA/core: Fix race when resolving IP address
Thanks Jason,
Regards,
Dag
Den 08.07.2019 19:50, skrev Jason Gunthorpe:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 01:16:24PM +0200, Dag Moxnes wrote:
>> Use neighbour lock when copying MAC address from neighbour data struct
>> in dst_fetch_ha.
>>
>> When not using the lock, it is possible for the function to race with
>> neigh_update, causing it to copy an invalid MAC address.
>>
>> It is possible to provoke this error by calling rdma_resolve_addr in a
>> tight loop, while deleting the corresponding ARP entry in another tight
>> loop.
>>
>> This will cause the race shown it the following sample trace:
>>
>> rdma_resolve_addr()
>> rdma_resolve_ip()
>> addr_resolve()
>> addr_resolve_neigh()
>> fetch_ha()
>> dst_fetch_ha()
>> n->nud_state == NUD_VALID
> It isn't nud_state that is the problem here, it is the parallel
> memcpy's onto ha. I fixed the commit message
>
> This could also have been solved by using the ha_lock, but I don't
> think we have a reason to particularly over-optimize this.
>
>> drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c | 9 ++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> Applied to for-next, thanks
>
> Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists