[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB3PR0402MB391622133CD116FDE26A4F9AF5F60@DB3PR0402MB3916.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 08:43:31 +0000
From: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
CC: "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
"l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
"andrew.smirnov@...il.com" <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
"ccaione@...libre.com" <ccaione@...libre.com>,
"angus@...ea.ca" <angus@...ea.ca>,
"agx@...xcpu.org" <agx@...xcpu.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8mm: Assign highest opp as suspend opp
Hi, Viresh
> On 04-07-19, 07:49, Leonard Crestez wrote:
> > On 7/4/2019 9:23 AM, Anson.Huang@....com wrote:
> > > From: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> > >
> > > Assign highest OPP as suspend OPP to reduce suspend/resume latency
> > > on i.MX8MM.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > index b11fc5e..3a62407 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@
> > > opp-microvolt = <1000000>;
> > > opp-supported-hw = <0x8>, <0x3>;
> > > clock-latency-ns = <150000>;
> > > + opp-suspend;
> > > };
> > > };
> >
> > What if the highest OPP is unavailable due to speed grading?
>
> What does this exactly mean ? How is the OPP made unavailable in your
> case ?
That is because in i.MX8M series SoCs, the speed grading and market segment
fuses settings could affect the OPP defined in DT, in a word, all possible OPPs
are defined in DT, but each parts could ONLY select some of them to be working
OPPs, so if the "opp-suspend" is added for 1 OPP in DT, if the part's speed grading or
market segment fuse settings make that OPP as unavailable, then that "opp-suspend"
is NOT working at all.
>
> What will dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp_freq() return in this case ?
If the OPP contains "opp-suspend" property is NOT supported by the HW, then there will
be no suspend OPP defined, so it will return 0. The _opp_is_supported() parses the opp-supported-hw
before opp-suspend.
>
> > Ideally we
> > should find a way to suspend at the highest *supported* OPP.
> >
> > Maybe the opp-suspend marking could be assigned from imx-cpufreq-dt
> > driver code?
I ever tried that, go through the OPP table and check the fuse settings, then runtime add "opp-suspend"
to the opp table, but unfortunately, the " struct opp_table " is NOT opened to be used, it is a private
structure?
>
> Sorry for jumping in late, the latest patch from Anson drew my attention to
> this topic :)
That is OK😊
Thanks,
Anson.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists