[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4da614a4-83c6-548c-a112-033b846c561b@web.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 10:42:35 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] rtc: stm32: One condition check and function call less in
stm32_rtc_set_alarm()
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 10:26:47 +0200
A condition check was repeated in this function implementation despite of
a corresponding check in the stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable() function.
Thus delete redundant source code here.
Suggested-by: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190707211638.sehikkear25dffah@shell.armlinux.org.uk/
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
v2:
Russell King pointed the change possibility out to omit a condition check
at this place.
drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c | 6 +-----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
index 8e6c9b3bcc29..773a1990b93f 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
@@ -519,11 +519,7 @@ static int stm32_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
/* Write to Alarm register */
writel_relaxed(alrmar, rtc->base + regs->alrmar);
- if (alrm->enabled)
- stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, 1);
- else
- stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, 0);
-
+ stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, alrm->enabled);
end:
stm32_rtc_wpr_lock(rtc);
--
2.22.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists