lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 8 Jul 2019 10:42:35 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] rtc: stm32: One condition check and function call less in
 stm32_rtc_set_alarm()

From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 10:26:47 +0200

A condition check was repeated in this function implementation despite of
a corresponding check in the stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable() function.
Thus delete redundant source code here.

Suggested-by: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190707211638.sehikkear25dffah@shell.armlinux.org.uk/

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---

v2:
Russell King pointed the change possibility out to omit a condition check
at this place.


 drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c | 6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
index 8e6c9b3bcc29..773a1990b93f 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
@@ -519,11 +519,7 @@ static int stm32_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
 	/* Write to Alarm register */
 	writel_relaxed(alrmar, rtc->base + regs->alrmar);

-	if (alrm->enabled)
-		stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, 1);
-	else
-		stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, 0);
-
+	stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, alrm->enabled);
 end:
 	stm32_rtc_wpr_lock(rtc);

--
2.22.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ