[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b614006a-17ac-e738-a3f3-08649f69a42c@st.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 09:12:52 +0000
From: Amelie DELAUNAY <amelie.delaunay@...com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
"linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC: "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rtc: stm32: One condition check and function call less
in stm32_rtc_set_alarm()
On 7/8/19 10:42 AM, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 10:26:47 +0200
>
> A condition check was repeated in this function implementation despite of
> a corresponding check in the stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable() function.
> Thus delete redundant source code here.
>
> Suggested-by: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190707211638.sehikkear25dffah@shell.armlinux.org.uk/
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@...com>
> ---
>
> v2:
> Russell King pointed the change possibility out to omit a condition check
> at this place.
>
>
> drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
> index 8e6c9b3bcc29..773a1990b93f 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-stm32.c
> @@ -519,11 +519,7 @@ static int stm32_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alrm)
> /* Write to Alarm register */
> writel_relaxed(alrmar, rtc->base + regs->alrmar);
>
> - if (alrm->enabled)
> - stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, 1);
> - else
> - stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, 0);
> -
> + stm32_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(dev, alrm->enabled);
> end:
> stm32_rtc_wpr_lock(rtc);
>
> --
> 2.22.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists