linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the keys tree with the integrity tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190709101107.0754b26c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 9 Jul 2019 10:11:07 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the keys tree with the integrity
 tree

Hi all,

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:33:33 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the keys tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   security/integrity/digsig.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   8c655784e2cf ("integrity: Fix __integrity_init_keyring() section mismatch")
> 
> from the integrity tree and commit:
> 
>   79512db59dc8 ("keys: Replace uid/gid/perm permissions checking with an ACL")
> 
> from the keys tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc security/integrity/digsig.c
> index 868ade3e8970,e432900c00b9..000000000000
> --- a/security/integrity/digsig.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/digsig.c
> @@@ -69,9 -70,8 +70,9 @@@ int integrity_digsig_verify(const unsig
>   	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>   }
>   
>  -static int __integrity_init_keyring(const unsigned int id, struct key_acl *acl,
>  -				    struct key_restriction *restriction)
>  +static int __init __integrity_init_keyring(const unsigned int id,
> - 					   key_perm_t perm,
> ++					   struct key_acl *acl,
>  +					   struct key_restriction *restriction)
>   {
>   	const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
>   	int err = 0;

I am still getting this conflict (the commit ids may have changed).
Just a reminder in case you think Linus may need to know.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped