linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung-krzk tree with the arm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190709101246.58e21f1b@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Tue, 9 Jul 2019 10:12:46 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Russell King <rmk@...linux.org.uk>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung-krzk tree with the arm
 tree

Hi all,

On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 09:16:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 09:33:47 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the samsung-krzk tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   5f41f9198f29 ("ARM: 8864/1: Add workaround for I-Cache line size mismatch between CPU cores")
> > 
> > from the arm tree and commit:
> > 
> >   9f532d26c75c ("ARM: exynos_defconfig: Trim and reorganize with savedefconfig")
> > 
> > from the samsung-krzk tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> > 
> > diff --cc arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
> > index 9b959afaaa12,f140532ddca7..000000000000
> > --- a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
> > @@@ -4,12 -5,7 +5,8 @@@ CONFIG_PREEMPT=
> >   CONFIG_CGROUPS=y
> >   CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y
> >   CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=y
> > - CONFIG_MODULES=y
> > - CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y
> > - CONFIG_PARTITION_ADVANCED=y
> >   CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS=y
> > - CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS3=y
> >  +CONFIG_CPU_ICACHE_MISMATCH_WORKAROUND=y
> >   CONFIG_SMP=y
> >   CONFIG_BIG_LITTLE=y
> >   CONFIG_NR_CPUS=8  
> 
> This is now a conflict between the arm-soc tree and the arm tree.

I am still getting this conflict (the commit ids may have changed).
Just a reminder in case you think Linus may need to know.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped