linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86: Kconfig: Remove CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907100755010.1758@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:58:21 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Hoan Tran OS <hoan@...amperecomputing.com>
cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@...rosoft.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        "sparclinux@...r.kernel.org" <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Open Source Submission <patches@...erecomputing.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86: Kconfig: Remove CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES

Hoan,

On Wed, 10 Jul 2019, Hoan Tran OS wrote:
> On 6/25/19 3:45 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019, Hoan Tran OS wrote:
> >> @@ -1567,15 +1567,6 @@ config X86_64_ACPI_NUMA
> >>   	---help---
> >>   	  Enable ACPI SRAT based node topology detection.
> >>   
> >> -# Some NUMA nodes have memory ranges that span
> >> -# other nodes.  Even though a pfn is valid and
> >> -# between a node's start and end pfns, it may not
> >> -# reside on that node.  See memmap_init_zone()
> >> -# for details.
> >> -config NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES
> >> -	def_bool y
> >> -	depends on X86_64_ACPI_NUMA
> > 
> > the changelog does not mention that this lifts the dependency on
> > X86_64_ACPI_NUMA and therefore enables that functionality for anything
> > which has NUMA enabled including 32bit.
> > 
> 
> I think this config is used for a NUMA layout which NUMA nodes addresses 
> are spanned to other nodes. I think 32bit NUMA also have the same issue 
> with that layout. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but it's your duty to provide the analysis why
this is correct for everything which has NUMA enabled.

> > The core mm change gives no helpful information either. You just copied the
> > above comment text from some random Kconfig.
> 
> Yes, as it's a correct comment and is used at multiple places.

Well it maybe correct in terms of explaining what this is about, it still
does not explain why this is needed by default on everything which has NUMA
enabled.

Thanks,

	tglx