lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190710160051.5b192606@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 10 Jul 2019 16:00:51 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Lubart, Vitaly" <vitaly.lubart@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the
 driver-core tree

Hi Tomas,

On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 07:12:34 +0000 "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Actually I've asked Greg this git expertise question: how the
> **exact** conflict resolution is carried between git trees (before it
> is finally resolved in upstream for all.). For next time If anyone
> has the answer, please let me know.

When I see a conflict, I fix it up and report it, then "git rerere"
will remember the resolution for me so that the next day it is fixed up
automatically.  When Linus merges the same trees he will do the same
(or a similar) merge resolution.  I depend on the maintainers to inform
Linus if the conflict is any anyway difficult to resolve.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ