[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPc1rOyFujyWk4HwmQb6YEXd=CEHKwN8AH_pKxk-6CA08w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 12:14:51 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@...tner.samsung.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] add coupled regulators for Exynos5422/5800
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 12:03, Kamil Konieczny
<k.konieczny@...tner.samsung.com> wrote:
>
> On 10.07.2019 11:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 at 16:12, <k.konieczny@...tner.samsung.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Kamil Konieczny <k.konieczny@...tner.samsung.com>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The main purpose of this patch series is to add coupled regulators for
> >> Exynos5422/5800 to keep constrain on voltage difference between vdd_arm
> >> and vdd_int to be at most 300mV. In exynos-bus instead of using
> >> regulator_set_voltage_tol() with default voltage tolerance it should be
> >> used regulator_set_voltage_triplet() with volatege range, and this is
> >> already present in opp/core.c code, so it can be reused. While at this,
> >> move setting regulators into opp/core.
> >>
> >> This patchset was tested on Odroid XU3.
> >>
> >> The last patch depends on two previous.
> >
> > So you break the ABI... I assume that patchset maintains
> > bisectability. However there is no explanation why ABI break is needed
> > so this does not look good...
>
> Patchset is bisectable, first one is simple and do not depends on others,
> second depends on first, last depends on first and second.
>
> What do you mean by breaking ABI ?
I mean, that Linux kernel stops working with existing DTBs... or am I
mistaken and there is no problem? Maybe I confused the order...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists