linux-kernel - Re: m68k: One function call less in cf_tlb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f9af74a1-dc4a-5ad9-9da3-8fba4b4f179c@web.de>
Date:   Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:11:00 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: m68k: One function call less in cf_tlb_miss()

> You better do,

It can eventually happen again under other circumstances.


> it can be a good learning experience!

This can be also possible.


>> * Can the suggested small refactoring matter for a specific software combination there?
>> * Would you like to clarify this change possibility a bit more?
>
> -EPARSE

I am curious where you got parsing (or more understanding) difficulties
for these questions.

Regards,
Markus