lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 08:11:00 +0200 From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org Cc: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: m68k: One function call less in cf_tlb_miss() > You better do, It can eventually happen again under other circumstances. > it can be a good learning experience! This can be also possible. >> * Can the suggested small refactoring matter for a specific software combination there? >> * Would you like to clarify this change possibility a bit more? > > -EPARSE I am curious where you got parsing (or more understanding) difficulties for these questions. Regards, Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists