[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190715220043.55E8A20665@mail.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 15:00:42 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] clk: Sync prototypes for clk_bulk_enable()
Quoting Andrey Smirnov (2019-07-15 13:12:29)
> No-op version of clk_bulk_enable() should have the same protoype as
> the real implementation, so constify the last argument to make it so.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>
> Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> ---
No cover letter, but I'm inclined to squash these all together into one
patch instead of 6. I'm not sure why each function gets a different
patch.
> include/linux/clk.h | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists