[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHQ1cqHCbObjpD4p-WVQmoP3Jth=j3ap-qCjuETj416rCBtjLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 07:53:26 -0700
From: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] clk: Sync prototypes for clk_bulk_enable()
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 3:00 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Andrey Smirnov (2019-07-15 13:12:29)
> > No-op version of clk_bulk_enable() should have the same protoype as
> > the real implementation, so constify the last argument to make it so.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
> > Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> > Cc: Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>
> > Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > ---
>
> No cover letter, but I'm inclined to squash these all together into one
> patch instead of 6. I'm not sure why each function gets a different
> patch.
>
Sure, will squash all in v2.
Thanks,
Andrey Smirnov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists