[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190716144730.GA7250@e107155-lin>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 15:47:30 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"Raju P . L . S . S . S . N" <rplsssn@...eaurora.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...aro.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Souvik Chakravarty <souvik.chakravarty@....com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/18] arm64: dts: Convert to the hierarchical CPU
topology layout for MSM8916
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 09:22:59PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> From: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@...aro.org>
>
> In the hierarchical layout, we are creating power domains around each CPU
> and describes the idle states for them inside the power domain provider
> node. Note that, the CPU's idle states still needs to be compatible with
> "arm,idle-state".
>
> Furthermore, represent the CPU cluster as a separate master power domain,
> powering the CPU's power domains. The cluster node, contains the idle
> states for the cluster and each idle state needs to be compatible with the
> "domain-idle-state".
>
> If the running platform is using a PSCI FW that supports the OS initiated
> CPU suspend mode, which likely should be the case unless the PSCI FW is
> very old, this change triggers the PSCI driver to enable it.
>
> Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
> Cc: David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@...aro.org>
> Co-developed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> ---
[...]
> @@ -166,12 +170,57 @@
> min-residency-us = <2000>;
> local-timer-stop;
> };
> +
> + CLUSTER_RET: cluster-retention {
> + compatible = "domain-idle-state";
> + arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x1000010>;
> + entry-latency-us = <500>;
> + exit-latency-us = <500>;
> + min-residency-us = <2000>;
> + };
> +
> + CLUSTER_PWRDN: cluster-gdhs {
> + compatible = "domain-idle-state";
> + arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x1000030>;
> + entry-latency-us = <2000>;
> + exit-latency-us = <2000>;
> + min-residency-us = <6000>;
> + };
> };
> };
I was trying to understand the composition of composite state parameters
in this series and that made me look at these DT examples.
What format does the above platform use ? I tried matching them to
both original as well as extended format and I fail to understand.
Assuming original format:
State power_state PowerLevel StateType StateID
SPC 0x40000002 0(core) 0(Retention) 0x2 (Res0 b[29]=1?)
CLUSTER_RET 0x1000010 1(clusters) 0(Retention) 0x10
CLUSTER_PWRDN 0x1000030 1(clusters) 0(Retention?) 0x30
Now extended format:
State power_state StateType StateID
SPC 0x40000002 0(Retention) 0x40000002 (Res0 b[29]=1?)
CLUSTER_RET 0x1000010 0(Retention) 0x1000010
CLUSTER_PWRDN 0x1000030 0(Retention?) 0x1000030
What am I missing ?
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists