[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190716144744.GB7250@e107155-lin>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 15:47:44 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
"Raju P . L . S . S . S . N" <rplsssn@...eaurora.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@...aro.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Lina Iyer <ilina@...eaurora.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Souvik Chakravarty <souvik.chakravarty@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] arm64: dts: hikey: Convert to the hierarchical CPU
topology layout
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 09:23:00PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> To enable the OS to manage last-man standing activities for a CPU, while an
> idle state for a group of CPUs is selected, let's convert the Hikey
> platform into using the hierarchical CPU topology layout.
>
> Cc: Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> ---
>
> Changes:
> - None.
>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi
> index 108e2a4227f6..36ff460f428f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hi6220.dtsi
> cpus {
[...]
> @@ -70,9 +128,8 @@
> };
>
> CLUSTER_SLEEP: cluster-sleep {
> - compatible = "arm,idle-state";
> - local-timer-stop;
> - arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x1010000>;
> + compatible = "domain-idle-state";
> + arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x1000000>;
> entry-latency-us = <1000>;
> exit-latency-us = <700>;
> min-residency-us = <2700>;
Again this must be original format and as per PSCI spec, your patch
changes this cluster sleep state into cluster retention state which I
think is not what you intended.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists