lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:36:26 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        xdeguillard@...are.com, namit@...are.com, pagupta@...hat.com,
        riel@...riel.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
        konrad.wilk@...cle.com, yang.zhang.wz@...il.com, nitesh@...hat.com,
        lcapitulino@...hat.com, aarcange@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/balloon_compaction: avoid duplicate page removal

On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 08:26:11 -0400 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 05:27:20PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote:
> > Fixes: 418a3ab1e778 (mm/balloon_compaction: List interfaces)
> > 
> > A #GP is reported in the guest when requesting balloon inflation via
> > virtio-balloon. The reason is that the virtio-balloon driver has
> > removed the page from its internal page list (via balloon_page_pop),
> > but balloon_page_enqueue_one also calls "list_del"  to do the removal.
> > This is necessary when it's used from balloon_page_enqueue_list, but
> > not from balloon_page_enqueue_one.
> > 
> > So remove the list_del balloon_page_enqueue_one, and update some
> > comments as a reminder.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
> 
> 
> ok I posted v3 with typo fixes. 1/2 is this patch with comment changes. Pls take a look.

I really have no idea what you're talking about here :(.  Some other
discussion and patch thread, I suppose.

You're OK with this patch?

Should this patch have cc:stable?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ