[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f95fbf72-090f-fb34-3c20-64508979f251@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 09:59:18 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] KVM: Boosting vCPUs that are delivering interrupts
On 12/07/19 09:15, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index b4ab59d..2c46705 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -2404,8 +2404,10 @@ void kvm_vcpu_kick(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> int me;
> int cpu = vcpu->cpu;
>
> - if (kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu))
> + if (kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu)) {
> + vcpu->preempted = true;
> return;
> + }
>
> me = get_cpu();
> if (cpu != me && (unsigned)cpu < nr_cpu_ids && cpu_online(cpu))
>
Who is resetting vcpu->preempted to false in this case? This also
applies to s390 in fact.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists