linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] KVM: Boosting vCPUs that are delivering interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:15:53 +0200
From:   Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] KVM: Boosting vCPUs that are delivering interrupts



On 18.07.19 09:59, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 12/07/19 09:15, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> index b4ab59d..2c46705 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
>> @@ -2404,8 +2404,10 @@ void kvm_vcpu_kick(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  	int me;
>>  	int cpu = vcpu->cpu;
>>  
>> -	if (kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu))
>> +	if (kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu)) {
>> +		vcpu->preempted = true;
>>  		return;
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	me = get_cpu();
>>  	if (cpu != me && (unsigned)cpu < nr_cpu_ids && cpu_online(cpu))
>>
> 
> Who is resetting vcpu->preempted to false in this case?  This also
> applies to s390 in fact.

Isnt that done by the sched_in handler?