lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d3f1532e-5fa5-d944-bb6b-1b97c1e6c9c9@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:31:23 +0200
From:   Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org, dtor@...gle.com,
        linux@...ck-us.net, dmurphy@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 26/26] leds: Document standard LED functions

Hi Pavel,

Thanks for the review.

On 7/18/19 1:03 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
>> Add a documentation for standard LED functions with regard
>> to differences in meaning between cases when devicename section
>> of LED name is present or not.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/leds/led-functions.txt | 223 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  Documentation/leds/leds-class.txt    |   3 +
>>  2 files changed, 226 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/leds/led-functions.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/leds/led-functions.txt b/Documentation/leds/led-functions.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..003b6b6271d1
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/leds/led-functions.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
>> +This file presents standardized LED functions and their meaning.
>> +
>> +Each LED function is described using below template:
>> +
>> +- LED function name
>> +    NDEV : <function meaning when LED devicename section is absent>
>> +    DEV  : <function meaning when LED devicename section is present>
>> +    DEVICENAME : <expected LED devicename for DEV case>
>> +    TRIGGER: <matching LED trigger>
>> +
>> +/* LED functions with corresponding trigger support */
>> +
>> +- activity
>> +    NDEV : system activity
>> +    DEV  : n/a
>> +    TRIGGER : "activity"
>> +
>> +- backlight
>> +    NDEV : n/a
>> +    DEV  : backlight of a frame buffer device
>> +    DEVICENAME : associated frame buffer device, e.g. fb0
>> +    TRIGGER: "backlight"
> 
> ndev: if there's single one on the platform?

Ack.

>> +- capslock
>> +    NDEV : n/a
>> +    DEV  : keyboard capslock state related to the specified input device
>> +    DEVICENAME : associated input device, e.g. input1
>> +    TRIGGER : "kbd-capslock"
>> +
> 
>> +- disk
>> +    NDEV : rw activity on any disk in the system
>> +    DEV  : rw activity on specified disk
>> +    DEVICENAME : associated disk, e.g.: hda, sdb
>> +    TRIGGER : "disk-activity", applies only to NDEV case
> 
> I'd sort this file according to the places where these leds are
> usually are present, to make it simpler for user to find the
> labels. capslock should go near scrollock etc.
> 
> Plus I guess explanation in which systems such LED is found would be
> good.

I need more input on that. No idea what you mean.

> Global "disk" LED is very common on the PCs, and we should make sure
> such LEDs have consistent labeling everywhere.

Could you please be more specific and give some examples of the rework
you propose? Whereas it's clear what you mean regarding keyboard LEDs,
I'm not sure what is your intention in case of "disk".

>> +- disk-read
>> +    NDEV : read activity on any disk in the system
>> +    DEV  : read activity on specified disk
>> +    DEVICENAME : associted disk, e.g.: hda, sdb
>> +    TRIGGER : "disk-read", applies only to NDEV case
>> +
>> +- disk-write
>> +    NDEV : write activity on any disk in the system
>> +    DEV  : write activity on specified disk
>> +    DEVICENAME : associated disk, .e.g" hda, sdb
>> +    TRIGGER : "disk-write", applies only to NDEV case
> 
> I don't see separated read/write LEDs very often. To keep the file
> size down, I'd list is at "disk-read, disk-write".

Ack.

-- 
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ