linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: slightly improve cache helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190719152303.GA20882@gate.crashing.org>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jul 2019 10:23:03 -0500
From:   Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: slightly improve cache helpers

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 08:24:56PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 11:49:52PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 07:04:43AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > > Is that a Clang bug ?
> > 
> > No idea, it happens with clang-8 and clang-9 though (pretty sure there
> > were fixes for PowerPC in clang-8 so something before it probably won't
> > work but I haven't tried).
> > 
> > > 
> > > Do you have a disassembly of the code both with and without this patch in
> > > order to compare ?
> > 
> > I can give you whatever disassembly you want (or I can upload the raw
> > files if that is easier).
> 
> What disassembly/files did you need to start taking a look at this? I
> can upload/send whatever you need.

A before and after of *only this patch*.  And then look at what changed;
it maybe be obvious what is the problem to you, as well, so look at it
yourself first?


Segher