lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 19 Jul 2019 13:40:13 -0400
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        keescook@...omium.org
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [5.2 REGRESSION] Generic vDSO breaks seccomp-enabled userspace on i386



> On Jul 19, 2019, at 1:03 PM, Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> The generic vDSO implementation, starting with commit
> 
>   7ac870747988 ("x86/vdso: Switch to generic vDSO implementation")
> 
> breaks seccomp-enabled userspace on 32-bit x86 (i386) kernels.  Prior to
> the generic implementation, the x86 vDSO used identical code for both
> x86_64 and i386 kernels, which worked because it did all calcuations using
> structs with naturally sized variables, i.e. didn't use __kernel_timespec.
> 
> The generic vDSO does its internal calculations using __kernel_timespec,
> which in turn requires the i386 fallback syscall to use the 64-bit
> variation, __NR_clock_gettime64.

This is basically doomed to break eventually, right?

I’ve occasionally considered adding a concept of “seccomp aliases”.  The idea is that, if a filter returns anything other than ALLOW, we re-run it with a different nr that we dig out it a small list of such cases. This would be limited to cases where the new syscall does the same thing with the same arguments.

I want this for restart_syscall: I want to renumber it.

Kees?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ