lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 22 Jul 2019 22:52:27 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/7] x86/percpu: Use C for percpu accesses when possible

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:41:06AM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:

> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
> index 99a7fa9ab0a3..60f97b288004 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
> @@ -91,7 +91,8 @@ static __always_inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val)
>   */
>  static __always_inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
>  {
> -	return GEN_UNARY_RMWcc("decl", __preempt_count, e, __percpu_arg([var]));
> +	return GEN_UNARY_RMWcc("decl", __my_cpu_var(__preempt_count), e,
> +			       __percpu_arg([var]));
>  }

Should this be in the previous patch?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ