lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190722210704.GL6698@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:07:04 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Cc:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 7/7] x86/current: Aggressive caching of current

On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 10:41:10AM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
> The current_task is supposed to be constant in each thread and therefore
> does not need to be reread. There is already an attempt to cache it
> using inline assembly, using this_cpu_read_stable(), which hides the
> dependency on the read memory address.

Is that what it does?!, I never quite could understand
percpu_stable_op().

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ