[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64e2db3a-cf58-0158-e097-1a504a8bb496@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:17:17 +0300
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Subject: [PATCH] fuse: cleanup fuse_wait_on_page_writeback
From: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@...tuozzo.com>
fuse_wait_on_page_writeback() always returns zero and nobody cares.
Let's make it void.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@...tuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
---
fs/fuse/file.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
index 5ae2828beb00..e076c2cf65b0 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -383,12 +383,11 @@ static inline bool fuse_page_is_writeback(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index)
* Since fuse doesn't rely on the VM writeback tracking, this has to
* use some other means.
*/
-static int fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index)
+static void fuse_wait_on_page_writeback(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index)
{
struct fuse_inode *fi = get_fuse_inode(inode);
wait_event(fi->page_waitq, !fuse_page_is_writeback(inode, index));
- return 0;
}
/*
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists