linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 37/50] ARM: dts: exynos: change parent and rate of bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJKOXPdC7U64dqFJzJNJJXPQ8_K_SXUOVrNGjOQqcDyNsmskwA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Jul 2019 14:06:32 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Lukasz Luba <l.luba@...tner.samsung.com>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
        Bartłomiej Żołnierkiewicz 
        <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>, kgene@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        kyungmin.park@...sung.com, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        s.nawrocki@...sung.com, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 37/50] ARM: dts: exynos: change parent and rate of
 bus_fsys in Exynos5422

On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 14:56, Lukasz Luba <l.luba@...tner.samsung.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/17/19 1:11 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 13:06, Lukasz Luba <l.luba@...tner.samsung.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/17/19 12:45 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 12:39, Lukasz Luba <l.luba@...tner.samsung.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>     &bus_fsys {
> >>>>>>            devfreq = <&bus_wcore>;
> >>>>>> +       assigned-clocks = <&clock CLK_MOUT_ACLK200_FSYS>,
> >>>>>> +                         <&clock CLK_DOUT_ACLK200_FSYS>,
> >>>>>> +                         <&clock CLK_FOUT_DPLL>;
> >>>>>> +       assigned-clock-parents = <&clock CLK_MOUT_SCLK_DPLL>;
> >>>>>> +       assigned-clock-rates = <0>, <240000000>,<1200000000>;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here and in all other patches:
> >>>>> I am not entirely sure that this should be here. It looks like
> >>>>> property of the SoC. Do we expect that buses will be configured to
> >>>>> different clock rates between different boards?
> This is the board file for Exynos5420/5422/5800 which enables buses.
> Thus, I have change them here. Patch 49/50 adds these buses to
> Exynos5800 (Peach Pi). In Exynos5420 there is no clock tree for
> bus_isp266. The parents for different devices could be also different.
> It is because i.e. in 5420 there is 2 bit in the WCORE 1st mux while in
> 5422 there is 3 bits (6 parents possible).
> That's why I have picked exynos5422-odroid-core.dtsi to reference
> the bus devices and pinned them into proper parent and changed rate.
> When you check patch 49/50 for 5800 not all the parents are the same.
>
> (1) I could create a dedicated files like: exynos5422-bus.dtsi,
> exynos5420-bus.dtsi, exynos5800-bus.dtsi which would include some
> base file with the basic &bus_X and set the right parent, rate.
> Then these files would be included into proper board file like:
> exynos5800-peach-pi.dts.
> Is this something that you would like to see?

I see now. Are there any differences in all these properties between
Peach Pi and Odroids? Both of them are using exynos5800.dtsi so that
could be a place for all clock assignments.

Best regards,
Krzysztof