[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190723161918.GB9140@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 09:19:18 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.3-rc1
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 08:33:15AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
[ ... ]
>
> Yes, I think so. Can someone try this, or something like it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index 9381171c2fc0..4715671a1537 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -1793,7 +1793,8 @@ void __scsi_init_queue(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct request_queue *q)
> dma_set_seg_boundary(dev, shost->dma_boundary);
>
> blk_queue_max_segment_size(q, shost->max_segment_size);
> - blk_queue_virt_boundary(q, shost->virt_boundary_mask);
> + if (shost->virt_boundary_mask)
> + blk_queue_virt_boundary(q, shost->virt_boundary_mask);
> dma_set_max_seg_size(dev, queue_max_segment_size(q));
>
> /*
This fixes the problem for me.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists