[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1563899014.3609.26.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 09:23:34 -0700
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.3-rc1
On Tue, 2019-07-23 at 09:19 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 08:33:15AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> [ ... ]
> >
> > Yes, I think so. Can someone try this, or something like it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > James
> >
> > ---
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > index 9381171c2fc0..4715671a1537 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > @@ -1793,7 +1793,8 @@ void __scsi_init_queue(struct Scsi_Host
> > *shost, struct request_queue *q)
> > dma_set_seg_boundary(dev, shost->dma_boundary);
> >
> > blk_queue_max_segment_size(q, shost->max_segment_size);
> > - blk_queue_virt_boundary(q, shost->virt_boundary_mask);
> > + if (shost->virt_boundary_mask)
> > + blk_queue_virt_boundary(q, shost-
> > >virt_boundary_mask);
> > dma_set_max_seg_size(dev, queue_max_segment_size(q));
> >
> > /*
>
> This fixes the problem for me.
Great, thanks!
I'm thinking this is the more correct fix:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/1563896932.3609.15.camel@HansenPartnership.com/
But we'll see what Jens says.
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists