[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95CD0533-576F-4B3A-8E80-D3D89967EE2C@brauner.io>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 19:50:49 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] pidfd: add pidfd_wait()
On July 24, 2019 7:45:38 PM GMT+02:00, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 7:47 AM Christian Brauner
><christian@...uner.io> wrote:
>>
>> This adds the pidfd_wait() syscall.
>
>I despise this patch.
>
>Why can't this just be a new P_PIDFD flag, and then use
>"waitid(P_PIDFD, pidfd, ...);"
>
>Yes, yes, yes, I realize that "pidfd" is of type "int", and waitid()
>takes an argument of type pid_t, but it's the same type in the end,
>and it does seem like the whole *point* of "waitid()" is that
>"idtype_t idtype" which tells you what kind of ID you're passing it.
>
> Linus
Well in that case we could add P_PIDFD.
But then I would like to _only_ enable it for waitid(). How's that sound?
Christian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists