linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] pidfd: add pidfd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <D9BD06E2-576A-4627-8047-0AA86B6CCDA9@brauner.io>
Date:   Wed, 24 Jul 2019 19:52:08 +0200
From:   Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] pidfd: add pidfd_wait()

On July 24, 2019 7:50:49 PM GMT+02:00, Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io> wrote:
>On July 24, 2019 7:45:38 PM GMT+02:00, Linus Torvalds
><torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 7:47 AM Christian Brauner
>><christian@...uner.io> wrote:
>>>
>>> This adds the pidfd_wait() syscall.
>>
>>I despise this patch.
>>
>>Why can't this just be a new P_PIDFD flag, and then use
>>"waitid(P_PIDFD, pidfd, ...);"
>>
>>Yes, yes, yes, I realize that "pidfd" is of type "int", and waitid()
>>takes an argument of type pid_t, but it's the same type in the end,
>>and it does seem like the whole *point* of "waitid()" is that
>>"idtype_t idtype" which tells you what kind of ID you're passing it.
>>
>>               Linus
>
>Well in that case we could add P_PIDFD.
>But then I would like to _only_ enable it for waitid(). How's that
>sound?
>
>Christian

Ah, sorry, just saw that that's what you suggested.

Christian