[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190724063520.GA21280@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 08:35:20 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] treewide: Remove dev_err() usage after
platform_get_irq()
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 11:16:23AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> diff --git a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c b/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c
> index 9b2232908b65..40e4e8e03428 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c
> @@ -1088,7 +1088,6 @@ static int sun4i_i2s_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> if (irq < 0) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't retrieve our interrupt\n");
> return irq;
> }
>
Just one example here, but you really want to remove those { } now as
well.
That's in this patch a lot, so as-is, I don't think this is ok, sorry.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists