linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] string: Add stracpy and stracpy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=whPA-Vv-OHbUe4M5=ygTknQNOasnLAp-E3zSAaq=pue+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:08:57 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc:     Yann Droneaud <ydroneaud@...eya.com>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Nitin Gote <nitin.r.gote@...el.com>,
        "jannh@...gle.com" <jannh@...gle.com>,
        "kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
        <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] string: Add stracpy and stracpy_pad mechanisms

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 6:09 AM Rasmus Villemoes
<linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote:
>
> The kernel's snprintf() does not behave in a non-standard way, at least
> not with respect to its return value.

Note that the kernels snprintf() *does* very much protect against the
overflow case - not by changing the return value, but simply by having

        /* Reject out-of-range values early.  Large positive sizes are
           used for unknown buffer sizes. */
        if (WARN_ON_ONCE(size > INT_MAX))
                return 0;

at the very top.

So you can't actually overflow in the kernel by using the repeated

        offset += vsnprintf( .. size - offset ..);

model.

Yes, it's the wrong thing to do, but it is still _safe_.

              Linus