linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4, 05/33] dt-bindings: mediatek: add RDMA1 description for mt8183 display

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqL439PCnG3B75uqCXb3-OfH2uK6qtU7XpUb-cEnPWRkkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jul 2019 16:23:54 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4, 05/33] dt-bindings: mediatek: add RDMA1 description
 for mt8183 display

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 9:20 PM CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Rob:
>
> On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 14:16 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 06:33:45AM +0800, yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com wrote:
> > > From: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
> > >
> > > This patch add RDMA1 description for mt8183 display
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt
> > > index afd3c90..bb9274a 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt
> > > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ Required properties (all function blocks):
> > >     "mediatek,<chip>-disp-ovl"              - overlay (4 layers, blending, csc)
> > >     "mediatek,<chip>-disp-ovl-2l"           - overlay (2 layers, blending, csc)
> > >     "mediatek,<chip>-disp-rdma"             - read DMA / line buffer
> > > +   "mediatek,<chip>-disp-rdma1"            - function is same with RDMA, fifo size is different
> >
> > This can't be determined by which chip it is? IOW, a chip may have both
> > rdma and rdma1?
>
> In MT8183, there are two different rdma. The difference is the fifo size
> in each one. I've a question: is it better to have two compatible string
> for each one, or just one compatible string for both but with a property
> to set fifo size?

If that's the only diff, then a property for fifo size is fine. We
just don't want to be adding a new property for each new difference.