[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1564024819.2621.4.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 11:20:19 +0800
From: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4, 05/33] dt-bindings: mediatek: add RDMA1 description
for mt8183 display
Hi, Rob:
On Wed, 2019-07-24 at 14:16 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 06:33:45AM +0800, yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com wrote:
> > From: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
> >
> > This patch add RDMA1 description for mt8183 display
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt
> > index afd3c90..bb9274a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,disp.txt
> > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ Required properties (all function blocks):
> > "mediatek,<chip>-disp-ovl" - overlay (4 layers, blending, csc)
> > "mediatek,<chip>-disp-ovl-2l" - overlay (2 layers, blending, csc)
> > "mediatek,<chip>-disp-rdma" - read DMA / line buffer
> > + "mediatek,<chip>-disp-rdma1" - function is same with RDMA, fifo size is different
>
> This can't be determined by which chip it is? IOW, a chip may have both
> rdma and rdma1?
In MT8183, there are two different rdma. The difference is the fifo size
in each one. I've a question: is it better to have two compatible string
for each one, or just one compatible string for both but with a property
to set fifo size?
Regards,
CK
>
> > "mediatek,<chip>-disp-wdma" - write DMA
> > "mediatek,<chip>-disp-ccorr" - color correction
> > "mediatek,<chip>-disp-color" - color processor
> > --
> > 1.8.1.1.dirty
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists