linux-kernel - Re: [1/2] string: Add stracpy and stracpy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <42a3af53-e349-6c5b-fa0f-0113fccbe9eb@web.de>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:40:43 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Subject: Re: [1/2] string: Add stracpy and stracpy_pad mechanisms

>>> @@
>>> (
>>> -x = strlcpy
>>> +stracpy
>>>   (e1.f, e2
>>> -    , i2
>>>   )@p;
>>>   ... when != x
>>>
>>> |
>>
>> I wonder about the deletion of the assignment target.
>> Should the setting of such a variable be usually preserved?
>
> If it is a local variable and never subsequently used, it doesn't seem
> very useful.

Such an explanation is easier to understand.

* How do you think about the possibility that it was (accidentally)
  forgotten to use such a local variable?

* Your transformation can result in an intentionally unused return value.
  Would you like point any more source code places out
  where values are unused so far?

Regards,
Markus