linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] string: Add stracpy and stracpy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7e489aa8-95ea-b3b0-9023-ba284212977f@web.de>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jul 2019 15:45:46 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] string: Add stracpy and stracpy_pad mechanisms

> @r@
> identifier f,i1,i2;
> struct i1 e1;
> expression e2;
> position p;
> @@
> \(strscpy\|strlcpy\)(e1.f, e2, i2)@p

I have got the impression that the replacement can work also
without an inherited position variable at the end.
How do you think about to omit this SmPL rule then?

Can it be nicer to reduce duplicate SmPL code a bit?

Regards,
Markus