Message-ID: <20190725144009.GA27432@penguin>
Date:   Thu, 25 Jul 2019 17:40:09 +0300
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:     Michal Vokáč <michal.vokac@...ft.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] Input: mpr121-polled: Add polled driver for
 MPR121

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 02:58:02PM +0200, Michal Vokáč wrote:
> On 25. 07. 19 10:57, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi Michal,
> > 
> > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 08:51:17AM +0200, Michal Vokáč wrote:
> > > On 21. 05. 19 7:37, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > Hi Michal,
> > > > 
> > > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 03:12:49PM +0200, Michal Vokáč wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I have to deal with a situation where we have a custom i.MX6 based
> > > > > platform in production that uses the MPR121 touchkey controller.
> > > > > Unfortunately the chip is connected using only the I2C interface.
> > > > > The interrupt line is not used. Back in 2015 (Linux v3.14), my
> > > > > colleague modded the existing mpr121_touchkey.c driver to use polling
> > > > > instead of interrupt.
> > > > > 
> > > > > For quite some time yet I am in a process of updating the product from
> > > > > the ancient Freescale v3.14 kernel to the latest mainline and pushing
> > > > > any needed changes upstream. The DT files for our imx6dl-yapp4 platform
> > > > > already made it into v5.1-rc.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I rebased and updated our mpr121 patch to the latest mainline.
> > > > > It is created as a separate driver, similarly to gpio_keys_polled.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The I2C device is quite susceptible to ESD. An ESD test quite often
> > > > > causes reset of the chip or some register randomly changes its value.
> > > > > The [PATCH 3/4] adds a write-through register cache. With the cache
> > > > > this state can be detected and the device can be re-initialied.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The main question is: Is there any chance that such a polled driver
> > > > > could be accepted? Is it correct to implement it as a separate driver
> > > > > or should it be done as an option in the existing driver? I can not
> > > > > really imagine how I would do that though..
> > > > > 
> > > > > There are also certain worries that the MPR121 chip may no longer be
> > > > > available in nonspecifically distant future. In case of EOL I will need
> > > > > to add a polled driver for an other touchkey chip. May it be already
> > > > > in mainline or a completely new one.
> > > > 
> > > > I think that my addition of input_polled_dev was ultimately a wrong
> > > > thing to do. I am looking into enabling polling mode for regular input
> > > > devices as we then can enable polling mode in existing drivers.
> > > 
> > > OK, that sounds good. Especially when one needs to switch from one chip
> > > to another that is already in tree, the need for a whole new polling
> > > driver is eliminated.
> > 
> > Could you please try the patch below and see if it works for your use
> > case? Note that I have not tried running it, but it compiles so it must
> > be good ;)
> 
> Hi Dmitry,
> Thank you very much for the patch!
> I gave it a shot and it seems you forgot to add the input-poller.h file
> to the patch.. it does not compile on my side :(

Oops ;) Please see the updated patch below.

> 
> > Input: add support for polling to input devices
> > 
> > From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> > 
> > Separating "normal" and "polled" input devices was a mistake, as often we want
> > to allow the very same device work on both interrupt-driven and polled mode,
> > depending on the board on which the device is used.
> > 
> > This introduces new APIs:
> > 
> > - input_setup_polling
> > - input_set_poll_interval
> > - input_set_min_poll_interval
> > - input_set_max_poll_interval
> > 
> > These new APIs allow switching an input device into polled mode with sysfs
> > attributes matching drivers using input_polled_dev APIs that will be eventually
> > removed.
> 
> After reading this I am not really sure what else needs to be done
> to test/use the poller. I suspect I need to modify the input device
> driver (mpr121_touchkey.c in my case) like this:
> 
> If the interrupt gpio is not provided in DT, the device driver probe
> function should:
>  - not request the threaded interrupt
>  - call input_setup_polling and provide it with poll_fn
>    Can the mpr_touchkey_interrupt function be used as is for this
>    purpose? The only problem I see is it returns IRQ_HANDLED.

I'd factor out code suitable for polling from mpr_touchkey_interrupt()
and then do

static irqreturn_t mpr_touchkey_interrupt(...)
{
	mpr_touchkey_report(...);
	return IRQ_HANDLED;
}

> 
>  - set the poll interval + min/max interval
>  - register the input device as usual (input_register_device)

Yes.

>  - What about the device_init_wakeup? It does not make sense for
>    polling I think.

We can either trust DT not to have the property for polled case, or add
more checks. I think we should simply trust DT. Even if it is wrong it
will not cause any issues.

> 
> Just nitpicking - I also ran checkpatch.pl on the patch and it spits
> out some warnings. I am not sure whether some of those should not
> be fixed.

I think in this particular case checkpatch is full of it.

Thanks.


Input: add support for polling to input devices

From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>

Separating "normal" and "polled" input devices was a mistake, as often we want
to allow the very same device work on both interrupt-driven and polled mode,
depending on the board on which the device is used.

This introduces new APIs:

- input_setup_polling
- input_set_poll_interval
- input_set_min_poll_interval
- input_set_max_poll_interval

These new APIs allow switching an input device into polled mode with sysfs
attributes matching drivers using input_polled_dev APIs that will be eventually
removed.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
---
 drivers/input/Makefile       |    2 
 drivers/input/input-poller.c |  207 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/input/input-poller.h |   18 ++++
 drivers/input/input.c        |   36 ++++++-
 include/linux/input.h        |   10 ++
 5 files changed, 265 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/input/input-poller.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/input/input-poller.h

diff --git a/drivers/input/Makefile b/drivers/input/Makefile
index 40de6a7be641..e35650930371 100644
--- a/drivers/input/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/input/Makefile
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 # Each configuration option enables a list of files.
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_INPUT)		+= input-core.o
-input-core-y := input.o input-compat.o input-mt.o ff-core.o
+input-core-y := input.o input-compat.o input-mt.o input-poller.o ff-core.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_INPUT_FF_MEMLESS)	+= ff-memless.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_INPUT_POLLDEV)	+= input-polldev.o
diff --git a/drivers/input/input-poller.c b/drivers/input/input-poller.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..008d6f362d60
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/input/input-poller.c
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Support for polling mode for input devices.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/input.h>
+#include <linux/jiffies.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
+#include "input-poller.h"
+
+struct input_dev_poller {
+	void (*poll)(struct input_dev *dev);
+
+	unsigned int poll_interval; /* msec */
+	unsigned int poll_interval_max; /* msec */
+	unsigned int poll_interval_min; /* msec */
+
+	struct input_dev *input;
+	struct delayed_work work;
+};
+
+static void input_dev_poller_queue_work(struct input_dev_poller *poller)
+{
+	unsigned long delay;
+
+	delay = msecs_to_jiffies(poller->poll_interval);
+	if (delay >= HZ)
+		delay = round_jiffies_relative(delay);
+
+	queue_delayed_work(system_freezable_wq, &poller->work, delay);
+}
+
+static void input_dev_poller_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct input_dev_poller *poller =
+		container_of(work, struct input_dev_poller, work.work);
+
+	poller->poll(poller->input);
+	input_dev_poller_queue_work(poller);
+}
+
+void input_dev_poller_finalize(struct input_dev_poller *poller)
+{
+	if (!poller->poll_interval)
+		poller->poll_interval = 500;
+	if (!poller->poll_interval_max)
+		poller->poll_interval_max = poller->poll_interval;
+}
+
+void input_dev_poller_start(struct input_dev_poller *poller)
+{
+	/* Only start polling if polling is enabled */
+	if (poller->poll_interval > 0) {
+		poller->poll(poller->input);
+		input_dev_poller_queue_work(poller);
+	}
+}
+
+void input_dev_poller_stop(struct input_dev_poller *poller)
+{
+	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&poller->work);
+}
+
+int input_setup_polling(struct input_dev *dev,
+			void (*poll_fn)(struct input_dev *dev))
+{
+	struct input_dev_poller *poller;
+
+	poller = kzalloc(sizeof(*poller), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!poller) {
+		dev_err(dev->dev.parent ?: &dev->dev,
+			"%s: unable to allocate poller structure\n", __func__);
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&poller->work, input_dev_poller_work);
+	poller->poll = poll_fn;
+
+	dev->poller = poller;
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(input_setup_polling);
+
+static bool input_dev_ensure_poller(struct input_dev *dev)
+{
+	if (!dev->poller) {
+		dev_err(dev->dev.parent ?: &dev->dev,
+			"poller structure has not been set up\n");
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+void input_set_poll_interval(struct input_dev *dev, unsigned int interval)
+{
+	if (input_dev_ensure_poller(dev))
+		dev->poller->poll_interval = interval;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(input_set_poll_interval);
+
+void input_set_min_poll_interval(struct input_dev *dev, unsigned int interval)
+{
+	if (input_dev_ensure_poller(dev))
+		dev->poller->poll_interval_min = interval;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(input_set_min_poll_interval);
+
+void input_set_max_poll_interval(struct input_dev *dev, unsigned int interval)
+{
+	if (input_dev_ensure_poller(dev))
+		dev->poller->poll_interval_max = interval;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(input_set_max_poll_interval);
+
+/* SYSFS interface */
+
+static ssize_t input_dev_get_poll_interval(struct device *dev,
+					   struct device_attribute *attr,
+					   char *buf)
+{
+	struct input_dev *input = to_input_dev(dev);
+
+	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", input->poller->poll_interval);
+}
+
+static ssize_t input_dev_set_poll_interval(struct device *dev,
+					   struct device_attribute *attr,
+					   const char *buf, size_t count)
+{
+	struct input_dev *input = to_input_dev(dev);
+	struct input_dev_poller *poller = input->poller;
+	unsigned int interval;
+	int err;
+
+	err = kstrtouint(buf, 0, &interval);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	if (interval < poller->poll_interval_min)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (interval > poller->poll_interval_max)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&input->mutex);
+
+	poller->poll_interval = interval;
+
+	if (input->users) {
+		cancel_delayed_work_sync(&poller->work);
+		if (poller->poll_interval > 0)
+			input_dev_poller_queue_work(poller);
+	}
+
+	mutex_unlock(&input->mutex);
+
+	return count;
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR(poll, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
+		   input_dev_get_poll_interval, input_dev_set_poll_interval);
+
+static ssize_t input_dev_get_poll_max(struct device *dev,
+				      struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	struct input_dev *input = to_input_dev(dev);
+
+	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", input->poller->poll_interval_max);
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR(max, S_IRUGO, input_dev_get_poll_max, NULL);
+
+static ssize_t input_dev_get_poll_min(struct device *dev,
+				     struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	struct input_dev *input = to_input_dev(dev);
+
+	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", input->poller->poll_interval_min);
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR(min, S_IRUGO, input_dev_get_poll_min, NULL);
+
+static umode_t input_poller_attrs_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
+					  struct attribute *attr, int n)
+{
+	struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
+	struct input_dev *input = to_input_dev(dev);
+
+	return input->poller ? attr->mode : 0;
+}
+
+static struct attribute *input_poller_attrs[] = {
+	&dev_attr_poll.attr,
+	&dev_attr_max.attr,
+	&dev_attr_min.attr,
+	NULL
+};
+
+struct attribute_group input_poller_attribute_group = {
+	.is_visible	= input_poller_attrs_visible,
+	.attrs		= input_poller_attrs,
+};
diff --git a/drivers/input/input-poller.h b/drivers/input/input-poller.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e3fca0be1d32
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/input/input-poller.h
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+#ifndef _INPUT_POLLER_H
+#define _INPUT_POLLER_H
+
+/*
+ * Support for polling mode for input devices.
+ */
+#include <linux/sysfs.h>
+
+struct input_dev_poller;
+
+void input_dev_poller_finalize(struct input_dev_poller *poller);
+void input_dev_poller_start(struct input_dev_poller *poller);
+void input_dev_poller_stop(struct input_dev_poller *poller);
+
+extern struct attribute_group input_poller_attribute_group;
+
+#endif /* _INPUT_POLLER_H */
diff --git a/drivers/input/input.c b/drivers/input/input.c
index 7494a0dede79..c08aa3596144 100644
--- a/drivers/input/input.c
+++ b/drivers/input/input.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 #include "input-compat.h"
+#include "input-poller.h"
 
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>");
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Input core");
@@ -603,20 +604,31 @@ int input_open_device(struct input_handle *handle)
 
 	handle->open++;
 
-	if (!dev->users++ && dev->open)
-		retval = dev->open(dev);
+	if (dev->users++) {
+		/*
+		 * Device is already opened, so we can exit immediately and
+		 * report success.
+		 */
+		goto out;
+	}
 
-	if (retval) {
-		dev->users--;
-		if (!--handle->open) {
+	if (dev->open) {
+		retval = dev->open(dev);
+		if (retval) {
+			dev->users--;
+			handle->open--;
 			/*
 			 * Make sure we are not delivering any more events
 			 * through this handle
 			 */
 			synchronize_rcu();
+			goto out;
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (dev->poller)
+		input_dev_poller_start(dev->poller);
+
  out:
 	mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
 	return retval;
@@ -655,8 +667,13 @@ void input_close_device(struct input_handle *handle)
 
 	__input_release_device(handle);
 
-	if (!--dev->users && dev->close)
-		dev->close(dev);
+	if (!--dev->users) {
+		if (dev->poller)
+			input_dev_poller_stop(dev->poller);
+
+		if (dev->close)
+			dev->close(dev);
+	}
 
 	if (!--handle->open) {
 		/*
@@ -1502,6 +1519,7 @@ static const struct attribute_group *input_dev_attr_groups[] = {
 	&input_dev_attr_group,
 	&input_dev_id_attr_group,
 	&input_dev_caps_attr_group,
+	&input_poller_attribute_group,
 	NULL
 };
 
@@ -1511,6 +1529,7 @@ static void input_dev_release(struct device *device)
 
 	input_ff_destroy(dev);
 	input_mt_destroy_slots(dev);
+	kfree(dev->poller);
 	kfree(dev->absinfo);
 	kfree(dev->vals);
 	kfree(dev);
@@ -2175,6 +2194,9 @@ int input_register_device(struct input_dev *dev)
 	if (!dev->setkeycode)
 		dev->setkeycode = input_default_setkeycode;
 
+	if (dev->poller)
+		input_dev_poller_finalize(dev->poller);
+
 	error = device_add(&dev->dev);
 	if (error)
 		goto err_free_vals;
diff --git a/include/linux/input.h b/include/linux/input.h
index e95a439d8bd5..10346211ff15 100644
--- a/include/linux/input.h
+++ b/include/linux/input.h
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
 #include <linux/timer.h>
 #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
 
+struct input_dev_poller;
+
 /**
  * struct input_value - input value representation
  * @type: type of value (EV_KEY, EV_ABS, etc)
@@ -156,6 +158,8 @@ struct input_dev {
 
 	struct ff_device *ff;
 
+	struct input_dev_poller *poller;
+
 	unsigned int repeat_key;
 	struct timer_list timer;
 
@@ -372,6 +376,12 @@ void input_unregister_device(struct input_dev *);
 
 void input_reset_device(struct input_dev *);
 
+int input_setup_polling(struct input_dev *dev,
+			void (*poll_fn)(struct input_dev *dev));
+void input_set_poll_interval(struct input_dev *dev, unsigned int interval);
+void input_set_min_poll_interval(struct input_dev *dev, unsigned int interval);
+void input_set_max_poll_interval(struct input_dev *dev, unsigned int interval);
+
 int __must_check input_register_handler(struct input_handler *);
 void input_unregister_handler(struct input_handler *);
 


-- 
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists