lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ddda9253-27df-755b-ed51-8abc2859f076@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Jul 2019 13:38:41 -0400
From:   Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Allow kprobes coexist with livepatch

On 7/26/19 12:14 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 22:07:52 -0400
> Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
>> These results reflect my underestanding of FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY in
>> light of your changes, so feel free to add my:
>>
>> Acked-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
> 
> Is this an urgent patch (needs to go in now and not wait for the next
> merge window) and if so, should it be marked for stable?
> 

Hi Steve,

IMHO, it's not urgent..  so unless Josh or other livepatch folks say 
otherwise, I'm ok with waiting for next merge window.  Given summer 
holiday schedules, that would give them more time to comment if they like.

Thanks,

-- Joe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ