[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190726140634.7d0ca4dd@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 14:06:34 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Allow kprobes coexist with livepatch
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 13:38:41 -0400
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 7/26/19 12:14 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 22:07:52 -0400
> > Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> These results reflect my underestanding of FTRACE_OPS_FL_IPMODIFY in
> >> light of your changes, so feel free to add my:
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
> >
> > Is this an urgent patch (needs to go in now and not wait for the next
> > merge window) and if so, should it be marked for stable?
> >
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> IMHO, it's not urgent.. so unless Josh or other livepatch folks say
> otherwise, I'm ok with waiting for next merge window. Given summer
> holiday schedules, that would give them more time to comment if they like.
I added it to my next merge window queue. If someone thinks it's more
urgent, I can move it to my urgent queue. I wont post to linux-next for
a few weeks, so there's time to extract it if need be.
Thanks!
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists