lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190726171352.5eaa4d83@coco.lan>
Date:   Fri, 26 Jul 2019 17:13:52 -0300
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
To:     Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
Cc:     "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ɓukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@...sung.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Fix broken references to files under
 Documentation/*

Em Fri, 26 Jul 2019 12:55:36 -0700
Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com> escreveu:

> On 7/26/19 4:47 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Solves most of the pending broken references upstream, except for two of
> > them:
> > 
> > 	$ ./scripts/documentation-file-ref-check
> > 	Documentation/riscv/boot-image-header.txt: Documentation/riscv/booting.txt
> > 	MAINTAINERS: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/samsung,exynos5250-trng.txt
> > 
> > As written at boot-image-header.txt, it is waiting for the addition of
> > a future file:
> > 
> > 	"The complete booting guide will be available at
> > 	  Documentation/riscv/booting.txt."
> >   
> 
> Yeah. We don't have complete booting guide defined in RISC-V land.
> Documentation/riscv/booting.txt will be available once we have that.
> 
> In the mean time, do we need to convert boot-image-header.txt to 
> boot-image-header.rst and fix the reference to 
> Documentation/riscv/booting.rst as well ?

Well, in the mean time, every time someone builds the Kernel with
COMPILE_TEST enabled, a warning will be produced.

So, my suggestion would be to write it on a different way, like:

	"A complete booting guide is being written and should be
	 available on future versions."

Or:
	TODO:
	   Write a complete booting guide.

And update this once the guide is finished. This should be enough
to prevent the warning.

With regards to converting it to ReST, that's recommended. I suspect
we could be able to finish the entire doc conversion in a couple
Kernel versions. 

Also, it should be really trivial to convert this one to ReST.

Thanks,
Mauro

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ