[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57eaa99a-d644-7b79-7177-a45d3ef1e71a@wdc.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 13:18:30 -0700
From: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
Cc: "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ćukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@...sung.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Fix broken references to files under Documentation/*
On 7/26/19 1:14 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Fri, 26 Jul 2019 12:55:36 -0700
> Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com> escreveu:
>
>> On 7/26/19 4:47 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Solves most of the pending broken references upstream, except for two of
>>> them:
>>>
>>> $ ./scripts/documentation-file-ref-check
>>> Documentation/riscv/boot-image-header.txt: Documentation/riscv/booting.txt
>>> MAINTAINERS: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/samsung,exynos5250-trng.txt
>>>
>>> As written at boot-image-header.txt, it is waiting for the addition of
>>> a future file:
>>>
>>> "The complete booting guide will be available at
>>> Documentation/riscv/booting.txt."
>>>
>>
>> Yeah. We don't have complete booting guide defined in RISC-V land.
>> Documentation/riscv/booting.txt will be available once we have that.
>>
>> In the mean time, do we need to convert boot-image-header.txt to
>> boot-image-header.rst and fix the reference to
>> Documentation/riscv/booting.rst as well ?
>
> Well, in the mean time, every time someone builds the Kernel with
> COMPILE_TEST enabled, a warning will be produced.
>
> So, my suggestion would be to write it on a different way, like:
>
> "A complete booting guide is being written and should be
> available on future versions."
>
> Or:
> TODO:
> Write a complete booting guide.
>
> And update this once the guide is finished. This should be enough
> to prevent the warning.
>
Sounds good to me.
> With regards to converting it to ReST, that's recommended. I suspect
> we could be able to finish the entire doc conversion in a couple
> Kernel versions.
>
Sure.
> Also, it should be really trivial to convert this one to ReST.
>
Yes. Let me know if you prefer to update it along with your series or I
will send the patch.
> Thanks,
> Mauro
>
--
Regards,
Atish
Powered by blists - more mailing lists