linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: kvm: Convert cpuid.txt to .rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5a18d0c0-8bfa-c936-11e5-8238a89b5b5f@redhat.com>
Date:   Sat, 27 Jul 2019 00:19:27 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Luke Nowakowski-Krijger <lnowakow@....ucsd.edu>
Cc:     linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: kvm: Convert cpuid.txt to .rst

On 08/07/19 22:20, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>>>> +:Author: Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>, Red Hat Inc, 2010  
>>> I rather suspect that email address doesn't work these days.
>>>   
>> No I guess it wont :). We would still keep this correct? 
> There's nothing good that will come from keeping a broken email address
> there.  You could either:
> 
>  - Just take the address out, or

I agree with this, there have been more authors since 2010.

Regarding the license, it was my understanding that if somebody wants
anything but GPL-2.0 they should put it in the file when they create it.
 That's because even if Glauber had a different idea of what license to
use, other contributors to the file couldn't know.

Paolo

>  - Track Glauber down and get a newer address; you could ask him about the
>    licensing while you're at it :)