| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190726140635.GB8767@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 16:06:35 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
jank@...ence.com, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
slawomir.blauciak@...el.com, Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/40] soundwire: intel: add debugfs register dump
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 06:39:56PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> Add debugfs file to dump the Intel SoundWire registers
>
> Credits: this patch is based on an earlier internal contribution by
> Vinod Koul, Sanyog Kale, Shreyas Nc and Hardik Shah. The main change
> is the use of scnprintf to avoid known issues with snprintf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/soundwire/intel.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 115 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/intel.c b/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
> index 317873bc0555..aeadc341c0a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> @@ -16,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/soundwire/sdw.h>
> #include <linux/soundwire/sdw_intel.h>
> #include "cadence_master.h"
> +#include "bus.h"
> #include "intel.h"
>
> /* Intel SHIM Registers Definition */
> @@ -98,6 +100,7 @@ struct sdw_intel {
> struct sdw_cdns cdns;
> int instance;
> struct sdw_intel_link_res *res;
> + struct dentry *fs;
> };
>
> #define cdns_to_intel(_cdns) container_of(_cdns, struct sdw_intel, cdns)
> @@ -161,6 +164,115 @@ static int intel_set_bit(void __iomem *base, int offset, u32 value, u32 mask)
> return -EAGAIN;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * debugfs
> + */
> +
> +#define RD_BUF (2 * PAGE_SIZE)
> +
> +static ssize_t intel_sprintf(void __iomem *mem, bool l,
> + char *buf, size_t pos, unsigned int reg)
> +{
> + int value;
> +
> + if (l)
> + value = intel_readl(mem, reg);
> + else
> + value = intel_readw(mem, reg);
> +
> + return scnprintf(buf + pos, RD_BUF - pos, "%4x\t%4x\n", reg, value);
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t intel_reg_read(struct file *file, char __user *user_buf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> + struct sdw_intel *sdw = file->private_data;
> + void __iomem *s = sdw->res->shim;
> + void __iomem *a = sdw->res->alh;
> + char *buf;
> + ssize_t ret;
> + int i, j;
> + unsigned int links, reg;
> +
> + buf = kzalloc(RD_BUF, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!buf)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + links = intel_readl(s, SDW_SHIM_LCAP) & GENMASK(2, 0);
> +
> + ret = scnprintf(buf, RD_BUF, "Register Value\n");
> + ret += scnprintf(buf + ret, RD_BUF - ret, "\nShim\n");
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> + reg = SDW_SHIM_LCAP + i * 4;
> + ret += intel_sprintf(s, true, buf, ret, reg);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < links; i++) {
> + ret += scnprintf(buf + ret, RD_BUF - ret, "\nLink%d\n", i);
> + ret += intel_sprintf(s, false, buf, ret, SDW_SHIM_CTLSCAP(i));
> + ret += intel_sprintf(s, false, buf, ret, SDW_SHIM_CTLS0CM(i));
> + ret += intel_sprintf(s, false, buf, ret, SDW_SHIM_CTLS1CM(i));
> + ret += intel_sprintf(s, false, buf, ret, SDW_SHIM_CTLS2CM(i));
> + ret += intel_sprintf(s, false, buf, ret, SDW_SHIM_CTLS3CM(i));
> + ret += intel_sprintf(s, false, buf, ret, SDW_SHIM_PCMSCAP(i));
> +
> + for (j = 0; j < 8; j++) {
> + ret += intel_sprintf(s, false, buf, ret,
> + SDW_SHIM_PCMSYCHM(i, j));
> + ret += intel_sprintf(s, false, buf, ret,
> + SDW_SHIM_PCMSYCHC(i, j));
> + }
> +
> + ret += intel_sprintf(s, false, buf, ret, SDW_SHIM_PDMSCAP(i));
> + ret += intel_sprintf(s, false, buf, ret, SDW_SHIM_IOCTL(i));
> + ret += intel_sprintf(s, false, buf, ret, SDW_SHIM_CTMCTL(i));
> + }
> +
> + ret += intel_sprintf(s, false, buf, ret, SDW_SHIM_WAKEEN);
> + ret += intel_sprintf(s, false, buf, ret, SDW_SHIM_WAKESTS);
> +
> + ret += scnprintf(buf + ret, RD_BUF - ret, "\nALH\n");
> + for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
> + ret += intel_sprintf(a, true, buf, ret, SDW_ALH_STRMZCFG(i));
> +
> + ret = simple_read_from_buffer(user_buf, count, ppos, buf, ret);
> + kfree(buf);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct file_operations intel_reg_fops = {
> + .open = simple_open,
> + .read = intel_reg_read,
> + .llseek = default_llseek,
> +};
DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE()?
> +
> +static void intel_debugfs_init(struct sdw_intel *sdw)
> +{
> + struct dentry *root = sdw->cdns.bus.debugfs;
> +
> + if (!root)
> + return;
> +
> + sdw->fs = debugfs_create_dir("intel-sdw", root);
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sdw->fs)) {
> + dev_err(sdw->cdns.dev, "debugfs root creation failed\n");
No, come on, don't do that. I've been sweeping the kernel tree to
remove this anti-pattern.
The debugfs core will print an error if you got something wrong, just
call the function and move on, you NEVER need to check the return value
of a debugfs call.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists