lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 26 Jul 2019 17:07:39 +0300
From:   Jari Ruusu <jari.ruusu@...il.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 079/271] x86/atomic: Fix smp_mb__{before,after}_atomic()

On 7/26/19, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 01:18:06PM +0300, Jari Ruusu wrote:
>> Shouldn't those clobber contraints actually be:  "memory","cc"
>> That is because addl subl (and other) machine instructions
>> actually modify the flags register too.
>>
>> gcc docs say: The "cc" clobber indicates that the assembler
>> code modifies the flags register.
>
> GCC x86 assumes any asm() will clobber "cc".

No worries then. Thanks for your clarification.

-- 
Jari Ruusu  4096R/8132F189 12D6 4C3A DCDA 0AA4 27BD  ACDF F073 3C80 8132 F189

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ