[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1564222799-10603-3-git-send-email-baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 18:19:59 +0800
From: Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com>
To: colyli@...e.de, kent.overstreet@...il.com
Cc: linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] bcache: count cache_available_percent accurately
The interface cache_available_percent is used to indicate how
many buckets in percent are available to be used to cache data
at a specific moment. It should include the unused and clean
buckets which we get from bch_btree_gc_finish function:
if (!GC_MARK(b) || GC_MARK(b) == GC_MARK_RECLAIMABLE)
c->avail_nbuckets++;
However currently in the allocation code we didn't distinguish
these available buckets with the metadata and dirty buckets, we
just decrease the c->avail_nbuckets everytime we allocate a bucket,
and correct it after a gc completes. With this, in a read-only
scenario, you can observe that cache_available_percent bounces,
it first go down to a number, like 95, and then bounces back to
100. It goes on and on, making users confused.
This patch fixes this problem by decreasing c->avail_nbuckets
only when allocate metadata and dirty buckets. With this patch,
cache_available_percent will always be accurate and avoid the
confusion.
Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com>
---
drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c | 10 +++++-----
drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 9 ++++++++-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
index 609df38..dc7f6c2 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
@@ -443,17 +443,17 @@ long bch_bucket_alloc(struct cache *ca, unsigned int reserve, bool wait)
SET_GC_MARK(b, GC_MARK_METADATA);
SET_GC_MOVE(b, 0);
b->prio = BTREE_PRIO;
+
+ if (ca->set->avail_nbuckets > 0) {
+ ca->set->avail_nbuckets--;
+ bch_update_bucket_in_use(ca->set, &ca->set->gc_stats);
+ }
} else {
SET_GC_MARK(b, GC_MARK_RECLAIMABLE);
SET_GC_MOVE(b, 0);
b->prio = INITIAL_PRIO;
}
- if (ca->set->avail_nbuckets > 0) {
- ca->set->avail_nbuckets--;
- bch_update_bucket_in_use(ca->set, &ca->set->gc_stats);
- }
-
return r;
}
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
index 41adcd1..b69bd8d 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
@@ -244,9 +244,16 @@ static void bch_data_insert_start(struct closure *cl)
if (op->writeback) {
SET_KEY_DIRTY(k, true);
- for (i = 0; i < KEY_PTRS(k); i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < KEY_PTRS(k); i++) {
SET_GC_MARK(PTR_BUCKET(op->c, k, i),
GC_MARK_DIRTY);
+
+ if (op->c->avail_nbuckets > 0) {
+ op->c->avail_nbuckets--;
+ bch_update_bucket_in_use(op->c,
+ &op->c->gc_stats);
+ }
+ }
}
SET_KEY_CSUM(k, op->csum);
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists