[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1564222799-10603-2-git-send-email-baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 18:19:58 +0800
From: Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com>
To: colyli@...e.de, kent.overstreet@...il.com
Cc: linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] bcache: use allocator reserves instead of watermarks
Commit 78365411b344 ("bcache: Rework allocator reserves") introduced
allocator reserves and dropped watermarks, let's keep this consistent
to avoid confusing.
Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com>
---
drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
index c22c260..609df38 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/alloc.c
@@ -622,13 +622,13 @@ bool bch_alloc_sectors(struct cache_set *c,
spin_lock(&c->data_bucket_lock);
while (!(b = pick_data_bucket(c, k, write_point, &alloc.key))) {
- unsigned int watermark = write_prio
+ unsigned int reserve = write_prio
? RESERVE_MOVINGGC
: RESERVE_NONE;
spin_unlock(&c->data_bucket_lock);
- if (bch_bucket_alloc_set(c, watermark, &alloc.key, 1, wait))
+ if (bch_bucket_alloc_set(c, reserve, &alloc.key, 1, wait))
return false;
spin_lock(&c->data_bucket_lock);
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists