[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR12MB326922CDCB1D4B3D4A780CFDD3C30@BYAPR12MB3269.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 15:56:36 +0000
From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com"
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: stmmac: Introducing support for Page
Pool
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Date: Jul/26/2019, 15:11:00 (UTC+00:00)
>
> On 25/07/2019 16:12, Jose Abreu wrote:
> > From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
> > Date: Jul/25/2019, 15:25:59 (UTC+00:00)
> >
> >>
> >> On 25/07/2019 14:26, Jose Abreu wrote:
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >>> Well, I wasn't expecting that :/
> >>>
> >>> Per documentation of barriers I think we should set descriptor fields
> >>> and then barrier and finally ownership to HW so that remaining fields
> >>> are coherent before owner is set.
> >>>
> >>> Anyway, can you also add a dma_rmb() after the call to
> >>> stmmac_rx_status() ?
> >>
> >> Yes. I removed the debug print added the barrier, but that did not help.
> >
> > So, I was finally able to setup NFS using your replicated setup and I
> > can't see the issue :(
> >
> > The only difference I have from yours is that I'm using TCP in NFS
> > whilst you (I believe from the logs), use UDP.
>
> So I tried TCP by setting the kernel boot params to 'nfsvers=3' and
> 'proto=tcp' and this does appear to be more stable, but not 100% stable.
> It still appears to fail in the same place about 50% of the time.
>
> > You do have flow control active right ? And your HW FIFO size is >= 4k ?
>
> How can I verify if flow control is active?
You can check it by dumping register MTL_RxQ_Operation_Mode (0xd30).
Can you also add IOMMU debug in file "drivers/iommu/iommu.c" ?
---
Thanks,
Jose Miguel Abreu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists